Visualize and evaluate the data in Table II
Visualize and evaluate the data in Table IIWhen interpreting your results, keep in mind that the chart plot will produce a central area of colour (in RED). If the harvest is likely to be non-detrimental, most of the answers will fall in the precautionary areas of Table 2, and will be depicted near the centre of the circle. Outlying points may indicate a low confidence in the probability that the harvest is sustainable and should prompt the Scientific Authority to look in more detail at the responses. It may be that further investigation is needed or that insufficient information exists on which to base a finding of non-detriment. Hence, this tool will not only assist with the decision making process of making a non-detriment finding, but it will also allow possible problems to be identified and rectified as soon as possible. Remember: It should be stressed that the compilation (and subsequent graphical representation) of the checklist does not necessarily in and of itself constitute a finding of non-detriment. Rather, the use of the checklist should inform the non-detriment finding, and can guide the Scientific Authority in obtaining the necessary information. |
Test your knowledge on non-detriment findings! Table 2 was used in part to make a non-detriment finding decision for Pelargonium sidoides in Lesotho. Pelargonium sidoides (common names: Pelargonium sidoides) is currently not listed in CITES, but it is believed that populations are under severe pressure due to land conversion and harvesting. Let us assume that you have been asked to find out if current harvesting of and trade in Pelargonium sidoides is sustainable. Review the chart and make a decision on whether international trade in Pelargonium sidoides should continue or not. Then compare your decision with that found in the Case study on Pelargonium sidoides.  |